Re: cosmologists vs geologists

David Campbell (bivalve@mailserv0.isis.unc.edu)
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:28:18 -0400

>On a tangent, one could argue that physics has hindered our understanding
>of the earth more than it has advanced it. Physicists said flatly the
>continental drift was impossible (despite diverse and abundant geological
>>evidence for it) and thus delayed its acceptance for 50 years or more. Of
>>course, with plate tectonics the geophysics said it was their idea all along.
>

It is true that the model as proposed for continental drift was not
physically possible. However, the evidence that it had happened in some
other fashion was strong.

Lyell did argue for a strict constancy of present processes into the past,
an extreme of uniformitarianism that has long been recognized as too rigid.
Ironically, some of the "proofs" of a young earth are based on such
extreme uniformitarianism, even as uniformitarianism is labeled as an
atheistic premise in the same book.

David C.