> > While I'm here, I note that in Craig's other post was a statement
> > defending his MIRM category on the grounds that, even though we
> > Christians know that nothing takes place without "theistic action" (at
> > least on the level of concurrence, etc.), the rest of the world does not
> > see it that way. I would argue that we should not let the rest of the
> > world define our categories; acceptance of categories created by atheists
> > is already a big source of trouble (I'm thinking of the unthinking
> > acceptance by much of the church of the view of God's identity as a
> > gap-filler who is therefore squeezed out by evolution and other
> > scientific advances). If we are going to classify, let's get the
> > categories right from the standpoint of Biblical theology, and then worry
> > about explaining it to the world.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Dr. Allan H. Harvey | aharvey@boulder.nist.gov |
I couldn't agree more with your last paragraph. I'm convinced that the
concept of God in the secular society (i.e. God of the Gaps) is nothing more
that the concept of God of the secular society.
Salu2
Eduardo