>:-) Me chauvanistic? Art, how could you say such a thing? Obnoxious, yes!
:-)
No more chauvanistic than anyone else with an idea!
>
>Your ideas may or may not work and can be evaluated at the time you choose
>to disclose them. But would you agree that after 167 years (After Lyell) of
>christians trying to conceive of some way to make the flood work, that there
>is no workable solution as yet?
Maybe, I would agree with that. However I would take exception to
characterizing the lack of a model as equivalent to the absence of a
process(es) or event(s). I realize the kicker is your word "yet", and at
least I have dedicated my time to addressing that problem. I am very
encouraged by what I have learned thus far, and I am hopeful that I will
have a rigorous model to share widely soon. But then I am an optimist by
nature, and don't have a definition for "soon" yet!