If nothing has any meaning at all, why did Rosenberg bother writing. After
all, his essay has no meaning (and therefore no value)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Douglas Hayworth <
becomingcreation@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone read and commented on the following essay?
>
>
> http://onthehuman.org/2009/11/the-disenchanted-naturalists-guide-to-reality/
>
> A non-scientist friend sent it to me for comment.
>
> My short answer is "Well, that's one philosophical perspective, but it's no
> more legitimate or defensible than any other perspective. It's only his
> choice to view the science as compelling this conclusion. The persuasive
> nature of the essay itself is testimony to the fact that there's more
> that just the science involved."
>
> Doug
>
>
-- William E (Bill) Hamilton Jr., Ph.D. Member American Scientific Affiliation Austin, TX 248 821 8156 To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Sat Dec 12 18:04:28 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 12 2009 - 18:04:28 EST