Hi David,
From my notes on her lecture:
"Neo-Darwinism is very bad; it is reductionistic [and] took the life out of biology."
"English-speaking biologists still don't agree...they don't get it."
"You neo-Darwinists, use your head! Of course it's a group! What is the individual here? It's a community!"
"Nature *does* make jumps because [the] parts become more [by] symbiogenesis"
"Kozo-Polyansky shouted to the world and it didn't listen."
"Nature is much more open and flexible, but people are rigidly trained."
Gregory
Cf. 2010 first English translation of "Symbiogenesis: A New Principle of Evolution" (1924)
http://www.en.globaltalentfcri.com/articles/549/Lynn-Margulis-profeessor-at-the-University-of-Massachusetts.html
________________________________
From: David Clounch <david.clounch@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>
Cc: George Murphy <GMURPHY10@neo.rr.com>; Ted Davis <TDavis@messiah.edu>; asa <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 2:02:10 AM
Subject: Re: [asa] ID question? - TE does or doesn't 'limit evolution'?
I just witnessed Lynn Margulis rail against 'neo-Darwinism' *and* 'western' biologists wrt their supposed 'mechanisms' of 'evolution,' which she thinks are bogus)
Can you point to this? Thanks.
__________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Oct 31 19:29:11 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 31 2009 - 19:29:11 EDT