We are dealing with a "working assumption." Aren't we? Moorad -----Original Message----- From: Bill Powers [mailto:wjp@swcp.com] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:01 AM To: Alexanian, Moorad Cc: asa@calvin.edu Subject: RE: [asa] Definition of evolution Moorad: It is not clear to me what is intended by adding the word "supposed." Is this intended to convey that it is not certain that it has occurred, but suppose that it has? bill On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Alexanian, Moorad wrote:How about: "Evolution is the supposed process, taking place over millions of year, whereby species may arise in such a way that later species are correlated to earlier species." Moorad ________________________________________ From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Powers [wjp@swcp.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:42 PM To: asa@calvin.edu Subject: [asa] Definition of evolution Some time ago I requested a definition of evolution, broadly construed. What I am looking for is a definition that would encompass all brands of evolution, including neo-darwinist, materialist, TE, ID, and perhaps others. Here is one you might try on for size: Evolution is a temporal process, taking place over millions of years, whereby species arise in such a way that later species are correlated to earlier species. The definition is intended to describe the evidence with the least amount of theoretical baggage. What do you think? Thanks, bill To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 30 2009 - 11:18:40 EDT