Bob Russell pointed out some years ago that the area usuaully referred to as "science and religion" is more accurately "science-religion-technology-ethics," a point I've tried to bear in mind. & one weakness of the position of many atheists is that they have no clear basis for their ethics. Of course that doesn't mean that they can't be nice people but their worldview provides no reason why they should be nice.
Shalom,
George
---- Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the link!
>
> I liked these lines:
>
> "while we talk about the clash between God and science, in practice it often comes down to disagreements about man and morals. The boundaries are not always neat." - William McGurn
>
> Maybe it is time that the 'narrow' (as Ted Davis has just said to me) discussion of 'science and religion' opened itself up a bit to involve areas of importance that it has not yet sufficiently considered?
>
> - G.A.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dave Wallace <wmdavid.wallace@gmail.com>
> To: ASA <asa@calvin.edu>
> Cc: David Opderbeck <dopderbeck@gmail.com>
> Sent: Mon, October 19, 2009 4:04:07 PM
> Subject: [asa] Francis Collins shows mild signs of dementia, NA snark
>
>
> God vs. Science Isn't the Issue
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704429304574467320574576460.html
>
> Dave W
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
>
> http://www.flickr.com/gift/
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Oct 19 10:29:39 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 19 2009 - 10:29:39 EDT