We need to be very clear about this. Evolution plays no part in geological
time and its elucidation.
Howver arguments put froward by Henry Morris and other YECs on the subject are
false.
I am surprised that these questions are still raised
Quoting Kirk Bertsche <Bertsche@aol.com>:
> Moorad,
>
> As .others have said, radioactive decay dating schemes are not based
> on evolution. In addition to the resources already mentioned, I'd
> recommend:
> Davis Young, Christianity and the Age of the Earth (http://
> www.amazon.com/dp/093466627X)
> Roger Wiens, "Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective" (http://
> www.asa3.org/ASA/RESOURCES/WIENS.html)
>
> In addition, many non-radiometric evidences for geologic age have
> been presented by Dan Wonderly. Two of his books are available on-
> line from IBRI:
> http://www.wonderlylib.ibri.org/
>
> Kirk
>
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Alexanian, Moorad wrote:
>
> > I have often heard that geological dating is based on the
> > supposition of evolution. Therefore, the fossil is dated by the age
> > of the geological strata and conversely. Is that so?
> > Moorad
> >
>
>
----------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Oct 12 23:16:04 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 12 2009 - 23:16:04 EDT