Re: [asa] The image of God- question for Lamoureux

From: Bill Powers <wjp@swcp.com>
Date: Sun Oct 11 2009 - 09:29:48 EDT

George:

You wrote in replying to Bernie:

"& your insistence on phrasing the issue in terms of an historical Adam
shows
that you have not escapted from your YEC understanding of Christianity.
You may not believe it anymore but I suspect that your understanding of
Christianity is still framed in those terms. & that will of course make it
difficult for you to understand Christian theology that is not formulated that
narrowly."

Perhaps this is changing the focus of the thread, but I am interested in
what ways you believe a "YEC Christianity" is different from a TE, OEC, or
ID, etc. forms of Christianity.

It is not clear to me that there are any "necessary" correlations.

But it does seem to me that non-YEC forms of Christianity *tend* to
engender a less immanent or less personal god.

bill

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Oct 11 09:34:17 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 11 2009 - 09:34:17 EDT