Re: [asa] Introducing Sin (once again)

Bernie

In my mind I was drawing a distinction between human and homo sapiens.
Fully human would be those that are capable of relating to God and are
thus created in the image of God. Essentially I would agree that it is
very well possible that a even a fuzzy boundary seperating homo sapiens
from an earlier ancestor could not be determined, thus in that sense I
agree with you but lets hear from the professionals in the field. Of
course fuzzy boundaries at the microscopic level are the norm in the
physical world.

Dave W

Dehler, Bernie wrote:
> I'm trying to stick to the point 1 in this thread. You are racing ahead, so hold on. We'll get to point 2 if everyone can agree on point 1.
>
> ...Bernie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Wallace [mailto:wmdavid.wallace@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:17 PM
> To: Dehler, Bernie
> Cc: asa
> Subject: Re: [asa] Introducing Sin (once again)
>
> ....
> Bernie
>
> ...Just because biologically it may well not be possible to point to a
> first human does not mean that at some point in the development of
> modern humans that God may have decided to reveal himself and establish
> a special relationship with a human pair or tribe...
>
> Dave W
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Oct 7 17:03:20 2009