I'd have to agree with Dave Wallace, and I was just in the middle of writing
a post along those lines.
And the idea that there are two camps involved in the global
warming/climate-change debate - the people who are correct, and the people
motivated by politics - just doesn't wash. It is entirely possible for AGW
claims to be true, yet for the people "demanding action" to be largely, even
exclusively motivated by politics. There's such a thing as co-opting truth
to an illicit end.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Dave Wallace <wmdavid.wallace@gmail.com>wrote:
> It seems to me that this is getting rather close to politics for this list!
> To my mind both sides have a political agenda. In Canada at least one
> could easily argue that the left wants a cap and trade tax so as to increase
> tax revenues, tax freedom day is already June 6th.
> Dave W
>
> Murray Hogg wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Sadly, I suspect you're right. I'm not sure what can be done there -
>> although fortunately people who allow their science to be driven by their
>> social agenda seem to be increasingly marginalized. Long may it continue!
>>
>> Blessings,
>> Murray
>>
>> John Burgeson (ASA member) wrote:
>>
>>> Murray -- thanks for the link. It will not register, however, on those
>>> who see AGW as a political issue.
>>>
>>> jb
>>>
>>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Aug 21 17:00:44 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 21 2009 - 17:00:44 EDT