From what I've heard from someone who is reading Steve Meyer's new book, he has a strongly positive view of the historical sciences. If anyone reading this has a copy -- the Messiah library copy is in still in process -- I would love to hear some specifics about this. The more I read Cameron's posts and interact with some other ID advocates, the more I think that there are two schools of thought on this, within the ID "camp." On the one hand, there are those who think that the appropriate attitude to hold toward historical sciences is deep scepticism, giving them a much lower status that other sciences; on the other hand, there seem to be those who have a lot of confidence in the historical sciences. Cameron seems to be leaning toward the former.
As I say, this is a conclusion that I am presently forming, and if I'm not drawing the appropriate conclusion I am more than open to correction.
Ted
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:47:21 -0400
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 30 2009 - 09:48:31 EDT