RE: [asa] Sam Harris on Collins

Harris writes:
"As someone who believes that our understanding of human nature can be derived from neuroscience, psychology, cognitive science and behavioral economics, among others, I am troubled by Dr. Collins's line of thinking. I also believe it would seriously undercut fields like neuroscience and our growing understanding of the human mind. If we must look to religion to explain our moral sense, what should we make of the deficits of moral reasoning associated with conditions like frontal lobe syndrome and psychopathy? Are these disorders best addressed by theology?"

Looks like a false dichotomy. We have to solve problems and mysteries with either science or religion, but not use/consult both? Harris makes it look like Collins might prefer religion over science, and that Collins may even be anti-science because of his faith in God. But Collins has a long track record in science, even as a science leader, and you'd think there would be a concrete example of something he did wrong/bad if this should be a real serious concern.

It looks like Harris is demanding that a NIH head be an atheist. No Christian of any kind would do. Sounds like a religious test.

...Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 9:35 AM
To: asa
Subject: [asa] Sam Harris on Collins

The NYT yesterday published an op-ed piece by Sam Harris opposing the
nomination of Francis Collins. It can be viewed at

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/27/opinion/27harris.html?th&emc=th

How should the arguments Harris makes be countered?

-- 
Burgy
www.burgy.50megs.com
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.