Re: [asa] observational vs. theoretical differences in scenarios; a direct question

Cameron Wybrow wrote:
>
> TEs do not accept Darwinian evolution because of quantum physics.
> They accept Darwinian evolution mostly on the strength of arguments
> which originated in the 19th century.
It seems to me that as long as God made small enough changes to the DNA
in the process of evolution that such would ensure that a God directed
evolutionary path would be indistinguishable from evolution derived from
random variations. Both varieties of evolution would still be subject
to natural selection, although probably God would not introduce change
that reduced the fitness of life?

I think quantum physics considerations only serves to make Gods actions
hidden from a theoretical sense, although small enough changes
introduced by God would still be hidden for all practical
investigations. Such quantum physics actions would seem to me to be
important to those with a strong view of kenosis like George appears to
have.

Dave W

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jul 2 08:29:14 2009