Gregory's notion that he can claim "victory against MN" simply because one proponent of that view has chosen not to expand upon one statement that he made is silliness in the extreme. Gregory has bailed out more than once on discussions I've had with him (back when I thought such attempts might accomplish something) but I've never claimed victory against - well, I'm not sure what. Whatever he calls his position.
Shalom
George
http://home.roadrunner.com/~scitheologyglm
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Arago
To: asa@calvin.edu ; Jon Tandy ; TDavis@messiah.edu ; kbmill@ksu.edu
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents - correction
Line Correction:
"Not to reply (unless it is for some reason not possible to reply at this time) would result in an on-line [i.e. ASA listserv] victory against MN as an incoherent ideology rather than simply as ‘the way science is (and supposedly always has been) done’."
--- On Sun, 4/19/09, Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca> wrote:
From: Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>
Subject: RE: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
To: asa@calvin.edu, "Jon Tandy" <tandyland@earthlink.net>, TDavis@messiah.edu, kbmill@ksu.edu
Received: Sunday, April 19, 2009, 7:30 PM
Hi Jon,
You raise some good questions in your recent post, which I will be glad to answer in due time. However, given that the thread began with a question to Keith Miller, which Ted then joined in defensively against, I'd rather wait to answer you until Tuesday at the earliest. Tomorrow is Orthodox Easter Monday.
As you may have read, a couple of days ago I wrote the following:
"If neither you, nor George, nor Keith can come up with a ‘non-natural agent’ that is not at the same time a ‘supernatural agent,’ Ted, then I am left with little choice but to claim a minor victory in this discussion on this list. I’ll give you until Orthodox Easter Monday to state your position on this question, otherwise I’m done with this thread and you can return or choose to ignore my challenge."
George has rightfully declined to speak of ‘non-natural agents’ on the basis that he didn't use the terms 'natural agents' and 'non-natural agents' in the first place. It was Keith, the editor of “Perspectives of an Evolving Creation,” who spoke about 'non-natural agents,' apparently conflating them with 'supernatural agents' as part of his 'explanation' of MN. This was done in an excerpt that he self-quoted from an article “The misguided attack on methodological naturalism” in the edited volume “For the Rock Record: Geologists on
Intelligent Design”. (http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200904/0087.html)
I have repeatedly asked him to distinguish these two categories – non-natural and supernatural – and to say if he acknowledges 'non-natural agents that are not supernatural agents.' He has yet to reply. One might wonder – why not?
This is what started the row: “There simply is no way to incorporate the actions of non-natural agents into a scientific research program.” - Keith Miller
What would happen to the ideology of MN if Keith’s assertion was not consistent with reality? My attack on MN is an accurately guided one, indeed.
Keith himself says: “The nature of science and the meaning and significance of methodological naturalism is a topic of significant importance for me. It figures very prominently in my effort at public science literacy, and defusing the public ‘creation/evolution’ debate.”
If Keith wants to try to ‘defuse public debate’ (read: in America) with a false conception of ‘science’ based on a philosophical assumption (Keith himself calls MN a ‘philosophical assumption’) that disqualifies (or simply refuses to speak about, thus silencing) all ‘non-natural agents’ that are not ‘supernatural agents,’ then this is a significant issue for folks at ASA to address. I hope you’ll thus be patient Jon and accept my reasons for waiting for a reply or lack thereof from Keith or Ted. Not to reply (unless it is for some reason not possible to reply at this time) would result in an on-line victory against MN as an incoherent ideology rather than simply as ‘the way since is (and supposedly always has been) done’.
Orthodox Easter Sunday Regards,
Gregory
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Apr 19 15:25:20 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 19 2009 - 15:25:20 EDT