11. The distribution of radioactive material. The long-lived stuff is
still around; the short-lived stuff is found only in miniscule
amounts.
12. The sheer volume of coal deposits. Almanacs give business records
of how much has been mined, by year, global-wide, since the 18th
century. No matter what mechanism one posits for coal formation, it
must be acknowledged that coal is the remains of living organisims. If
the earth is 6000 years old, those organisms could not have co-resided
on it. Same argument for oil, BTW.
jb
On 4/1/09, Jon Tandy <tandyland@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I am putting together some summaries of scientific evidences, possibly as a
> PowerPoint, etc., as a quick summary of the most powerful evidences that
> need to be dealt with by any creation science theory that wants to take
> science seriously. Except for the first one, I don't have all the items
> identified, so I'm not sure what quantity that I'll end up with. For
> instance,
>
>
>
> 10 Evidences for the Age of the Universe
>
> 20 Evidences for the Age of the Earth
>
> 20 Evidences against a Global Flood
>
> 20 Evidences for the Fossil Record
>
> 20 Evidences for Common Descent
>
> 20 Evidences from Human History
>
>
>
>
>
> For my "10 Evidences for the Age of the Universe", I have the following so
> far:
>
> 1. Speed of Light - distance to objects much further than 4000 light years
>
> 2. Stellar Parallax - using geometry to measure distance, independent of
> speed of light
>
> 3. Size of Astronomical Objects - another geometry issue, huge galaxies of
> billions of stars that appear to us only miniscule
>
> 4. Star formation and death - time and space required for life cycles of
> stars
>
> 5. Detailed history of stellar events - details of supernova explosions,
> etc., indicate real history over real time
>
> 6. Light echoes from supernovas - geometry of space from reflections of
> supernovas
>
> 7. Redshift of Galaxies - confirmation of expansion of the universe
>
> 8. Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation - confirmation of Big Bang theory
>
> 9. Age of moon rocks - radiometric dating of rocks from the moon
>
> 10. Age of meteorites - radiometric dating of meteorites agrees with moon
> and earth rocks
>
>
>
>
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
> Jon Tandy
>
>
>
>
-- Burgy www.burgy.50megs.com To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Wed Apr 1 12:18:30 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 01 2009 - 12:18:30 EDT