RE: [asa] Near Starlight Problem; Adam would never see all of Orion's belt?

Dave W. said:
" Question Don't some who accept appearance of age say that the
fossils were placed in the geologic column to test our faith and similar
things about speed of light problems. "

I think the YEC answer is that they accept all the facts (DNA, fossil record, etc). The problem is not the evidence, but the INTERPRETATION of the evidence. Evolutionists think everything is ancient, why?... because it is assumed to be ancient. Ultimately, the problem with evolutionists is their worldview- starting with an ancient cosmos and earth. The layers in geology are not due to eons of time, but rather the worldwide flood. Since evolutionists deny a worldwide flood, they are blinded on this point. Also because of this blindness, evolutionists will miss out on many more interesting scientific facts, such as T-Rex being initially a vegetarian (as all carnivores were until Adam sinned and death entered the world).

...Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:53 PM
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Near Starlight Problem; Adam would never see all of Orion's belt?

I don't have much contact with YECs except those that declare in a loud
beligarant voice that they did not descent from monkeys, thank you very
much... Question Don't some who accept appearance of age say that the
fossils were placed in the geologic column to test our faith and similar
things about speed of light problems. If yes how prevalent is this
assumption of testing our faith?

Dave W

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Feb 24 15:23:46 2009