Quoting Douglas Hayworth:I agree. As you said in a previous post, Darwin deserves recognition as one of the finest scientists ever, and I think he is also a good example of humility with regard to science/religion issues. But that is no reason to venerate him in church. The church has never given that sort of special honor to other men, and to do so in this case is more likely to confirm to conservative Christians that liberal churches have compromised on faith in Christ alone than it is to build bridges of understanding.Here is another angle on this topic. Perhaps the church should make a concerted effort to honor fellow believers in the sciences (from their own congregations as well as more broadly). Perhaps the church has failed to affirm vocations in the sciences. Perhaps the church needs to recognize and honor all vocational service (sciences, arts, humanities, engineering, etc, etc) as divine callings. We do so honor pastors and missionaries -- why no others? Keith To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:04:51 EST