[asa] LCMS YEC vs ID question/was Science as Christian vocation

From: Wendee Holtcamp <bohemian@wendeeholtcamp.com>
Date: Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:37:13 EST

George - are you Lutheran/Missouri Synod? Do you know at what time they changed their stance from purely YEC to what seems to be an embracing of ID in their latest online resources? I remember researching it years back and seeing only YEC info but now they've also added in ID verbiage. This is for my book that I'm writing, and I thought maybe someone who followed it a bit more closely over the past decade might know?

Best,
Wendee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Wendee Holtcamp, M.S. Wildlife Ecology
    Freelance Writer * Photographer * Bohemian
          http://www.wendeeholtcamp.com
     http://bohemianadventures.blogspot.com
~~6-wk Online Writing Course Starts Feb 21, 2009~~
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'Better to light a candle than curse the darkness'

Ted is right that Lutherans don't seem to have given a great deal of attention to science-theology issues in the perios in question. There were exceptions - Theodore Graebner of the Missouri Synod & Byron Nelson (I believe the current ID Paul Nelson's grandfather) of the old American Lutheran Church. Both were strongly anti-evolution. I don't know as much about the Pennsylvania variety of Lutherans at that period as I do of the more conservative midwestern ones. (Francis Pieper, the chief theologian of Missouri, argued for - though he didn't insist upon - geocentrism in his 1917 _Christliche Dogmatik_. He did insist upon 6 day creation.) I do have one book from the 1920s that deals mostly with cosmological questions by an eastern Lutheran but can't recall name or title now - I'll let you know when I'm home.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Feb 11 12:38:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:38:03 EST