David said:
"However, there doesn't seem to be any way that the existing data fits a bottleneck of two people. "
I argued this a while back, suggesting to George Murphy that he should definitely state there is no historical Adam and Eve because evolution happens in groups, not individuals. He responded that it was possible that all humanity derived biologically from one pair, and appealed to Dr. Campbell for support, of which Dr. Campbell agreed.
Later- someone showed me a quote from Francis Collins saying there's no way he could see how humanity could descend from one couple. I'm going with Collins.
...Bernie
________________________________
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of David Opderbeck
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 12:50 PM
To: James Patterson
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Two questions...
James - you are correct that not all TE views have to deny a "special creation" of man. However, there doesn't seem to be any way that the existing data fits a bottleneck of two people. This is the gaping hole in the RTB approach, IMHO. It really doesn't deal with all the data.
David W. Opderbeck
Associate Professor of Law
Seton Hall University Law School
Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 9 12:39:35 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 09 2009 - 12:39:35 EST