You do indeed disagree terribly here. MN has been part of the scientific community's tacit understanding of how science works for the past ~350 years and is held by scientists of different religious faiths as well as atheists and agnostics. The reason that it is maintained consistently is that it has been found to lead to fruitful scientific work. MN is quite consistent with good Christian theologies but is not dependent upon any of them.
Shalom
George
http://home.neo.rr.com/scitheologyglm
----- Original Message -----
From: David Clounch
To: john_walley@yahoo.com
Cc: Marcio Pie ; ASA
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: [asa] C.S. Lewis on ID
John,
I terribly disagree.
MN is a Christian theological solution to a theological problem and should not be taught in schools.
................................
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Nov 26 08:07:28 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 26 2008 - 08:07:28 EST