Interesting article in The Scientist illustrating that the norms of science
are not truly cooperative: http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55240/
I love the allegation of plagiarism against the author who is alleging that
his work was subsequently plagiarized! A hint that Lawrence is perhaps a
bit unhinged: there is no "intellectual property" in "results and
conclusions" per se -- either there is copyright protections for a
particular *expression* of results and conclusions, or patent protection for
a new, useful and non-obvious product, process or method derived from the
results and conclusions if a patent application is filed.
David W. Opderbeck
Associate Professor of Law
Seton Hall University Law School
Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Nov 25 13:32:32 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 25 2008 - 13:32:32 EST