Sounds so simple, change a couple genes and have a new species. But
nobody knows what all the genes do, how they interact, how they are
controlled, etc. Evolving a new species seems to me to be more difficult
than expecting a two-year-old to design a new aircraft by showing him the
blueprints for a 737.
Dave (ASA)
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:07:05 -0700 "Dehler, Bernie"
<bernie.dehler@intel.com> writes:
I accept evolution because of DNA evidence, but I still wonder why
evolution can't be shown in the lab... for example, creating a new
creature from fruit flies. It seems like under controlled circumstances,
we should be able to do things quickly that might take nature millions of
years to do.
____________________________________________________________
Stop foreclosure. Click here to stay in your home and rebuild credit.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3meXwldKG2rbULISH1i05NHUieT4c2zGQ619P0deMmAvXpAp/
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Aug 25 17:20:50 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 25 2008 - 17:20:50 EDT