That post, like 98% of the content at UD, is a joke. It is best used as a case study of how not to think scientifically. It lacks any understanding or engagement of actual data. It's not even worthy of deconstruction. It's typical of UD.
The remaining questions I have are:
1. How many ID theorists know that they're not telling the truth about evolutionary theory? 5%? 20%? Somewhere in there, I think.
2. Why do people read UD?
Steve Matheson
>>> Dave Wallace <wmdavid.wallace@gmail.com> 08/23/08 10:29 AM >>>
http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/thoughts-on-parameterized-vs-open-ended-evolution-and-the-production-of-variability/
I found this post on UcD somewhat interesting however, I have only a
vague idea as to what Parameterized Evolution is. Can anyone point to a
simple definition. As best I can tell it involves a
predetermination/limitation of biological evolutionary search space.
Dave W (ASA member)
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Aug 23 12:30:13 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 23 2008 - 12:30:13 EDT