An interesting story out of England today:
In summary, it reads:
It's one thing to disagree with somebody. It's another to censor them.
That's the central problem with the United Kingdom's decision to
condemn The Great Global Warming Swindle, a documentary by Martin
Durkin arguing exactly what its title implies.
A response to the global warming awareness popularized by An
Inconvenient Truth, Durkin's film was considered disingenuous from the
perspective of British broadcast regulator Ofek, which ruled that
Channel 4 violated the country's boundaries of impartiality when it
broadcast the movie last year. ...
How does this case differ from Shapely's attack on Velikowsky? I have
long concluded that Velikovsky was wrong -- but Shapely's attack
prolonged his case long after it should have been forgotten. Censoring
Durkin will have the same effect.
Burgy
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Aug 18 16:22:11 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 18 2008 - 16:22:12 EDT