Re: [asa] Proof That Common Descent is NOT Begging the Question

From: David Campbell <pleuronaia@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 12 2008 - 18:12:39 EDT

> But there could be discontinuity at some points, not necessarily "radical" discontinuity, producing the same branching tree pattern.<

This is a possible position to hold, and in fact seems to more or less
be the position of Behe, but popular ID and creation science adamantly
affirm radical discontinuity. It may be very hard to find a clear way
to distinguish between this and full continuity, since the data are
incomplete and sometimes misleading (homoplasy, etc.).

-- 
Dr. David Campbell
425 Scientific Collections
University of Alabama
"I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams"
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Aug 12 18:12:55 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 12 2008 - 18:12:55 EDT