Rich's question is pertinent. My comment is not relevant to the title of
the thread, but only to Moorad's last statement. My apologies for the
thread splitting.
Don
Rich Blinne wrote:
> I'm lost here. What does this have to do with whether the fine tuning
> argument is valid or not?
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Don Nield wrote:
>
>> I disagree with Moorad on a number of things but on this one I agree
>> with him. A Creator must be an Intelligent Designer. A designer (with
>> a small d) need not be a Creator.
>> I find it interesting that Ken Miller in his latest book argues that
>> Behe's version of a designer is in effect a creator.
>> Don
>>
>> Alexanian, Moorad wrote:
>>> If I am not wrong, a designer need not be a Creator, but certainly a
>>> Creator is a Designer and if you can create then you must be
>>> intelligent. Therefore, a Creator must be an Intelligent Designer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Moorad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 30 19:37:42 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 30 2008 - 19:37:42 EDT