On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:08 PM, PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your version of ID however is somewhat at odds with how ID is commonly
> applied and we run the risk of conflating the two concepts. ID as
> proposed by the mainstream is not about a police investigation, no eye
> witnesses, no physical evidence, no motives means and opportunities.
>
However, Phillip Johnson, the so-called "father of ID" sometimes
characterizes science as a legal investigation. True he doesn't deal with
eyewitnesses, but his analogies deal analyzing physical evidence.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
-- William E (Bill) Hamilton Jr., Ph.D. Member American Scientific Affiliation Rochester, MI/Austin, TX 248 821 8156 To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Wed Jul 2 14:55:40 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 02 2008 - 14:55:40 EDT