RE: [asa] Chance or design?

How come regularity?
 
Moorad

________________________________

From: PvM [mailto:pvm.pandas@gmail.com]
Sent: Thu 6/19/2008 12:57 AM
To: Alexanian, Moorad
Cc: AmericanScientificAffiliation
Subject: Re: [asa] Chance or design?

Of course your argument ignores a simple possibility namely a
'regularity'. It both explains how an electron and a proton can join
together to form an atom and how we can define a theory to explain
this event.
False dichotomy. flawed conclusions.

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Alexanian, Moorad <alexanian@uncw.edu> wrote:
> An electron and a proton can form an atom. Was it chance? Was it designed? Which is it? If chance, then how can one develop a theory? If designed, then you can attempt to develop a theory to explain the fact and consider more complex, atomic systems.
>
>
>
> Moorad
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jun 19 10:28:14 2008