Re: [asa] Saving Darwin: What theological changes are required?

From: Keith Miller <kbmill@ksu.edu>
Date: Tue Jun 10 2008 - 10:11:42 EDT

Karl wrote:

> Dualism is one of those meta questions that make it possible to ever
> really get on the same page. Everything I wrote is irrelevant if
> dualism is true. If you are a dualist, you can keep ALL the
> doctrines, and change nothing. When I say "must" I really mean
> "unless you are a dualist, you must". So feel free to reject all my
> proposals as they don't apply to a dualistic understanding.

I did not assume dualism in my responses to the questions, yet I did
not reject the theological statements concerning the historicity of
Adam, the Fall, or the imago dei (at least as I defined those
concepts). My responses could be held by either dualists or monists.

Keith

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Jun 10 10:15:43 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 10 2008 - 10:15:43 EDT