But why are we discussing Egnor at all? Is it not that he made a
statement in an ID context, and hence it is appropriate for Rich to
react to Egnor in that context?
Don
Jack wrote:
> I I dont think what Egnor said was inflammatory or inaccurate. I think you are blowing his comments out of proportion, at least those comments we are talking about in this thread. I think you are reacting against all of ID and not just what Egnor said. What he said isnt that big of a deal.
>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri May 30 21:14:46 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 30 2008 - 21:14:47 EDT