RE: [asa] Science lesson from ICR

What is the evolutionary (technical) response to the question?

________________________________

From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of Jon Tandy
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:50 PM
To: 'asa'
Subject: RE: [asa] Science lesson from ICR

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of j burg
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 10:20 AM
To: asa
Subject: [asa] Science lesson from ICR

"So, which interpretation is right? Knowing that rivers don't flow

uphill and no leftover sedimentary deposits are found, evolutionists

have a lot of explaining to do when it comes to the Grand Canyon. The

Bible, however, says that a flood covered the whole earth (see Genesis

7:18-20). This means we should find places where the water drained.

The Grand Canyon is one of those places. It is a washed-out spillway

and provides great evidence for Noah's Flood."

Their consistent error is, of course, not looking at ALL the evidence.

Not to mention a not-so-subtle mockery and name calling game. The above
statement, in paraphrase, boils down to simple rhetoric: "Evolutionists
are so biased in their view, that they will defend water running uphill
before they will allow their precious evolutionary theories to be
challenged. Obviously, even an elementary school student knows water
doesn't run uphill, which proves they are smarter than the
evolutionists."

Okay, maybe that's paraphrased a little too much, but that seems to me
the clear implication of the second sentence above.

Jon Tandy

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri May 30 16:14:46 2008