Re: [asa] Is evolution a fact?

Any change of meaning in the following?

  "A theory by definition cannot be a fact. Evolution is both a theory and a fact; but the theory of evolution is not the same as the fact of natural history, although the theory [of evolution] leans on the fact [of natural history].
   
  The fact of natural history is abundantly and most compellingly evident in the fossil record: Fossils clearly indicate that organisms 500 million years ago were quite unlike organisms 100 million years ago which in turn were quite unlike organisms existing today. These changes in organisms are facts of natural history and taken together make natural history a fact."
   
  A. Moorad is smiling! ;-)
   
  
Don Winterstein <dfwinterstein@msn.com> wrote:
            A theory by definition cannot be a fact. Evolution is both a theory and a fact; but the theory of evolution is not the same as the fact of evolution, although the theory leans on the fact.
   
  The fact of evolution is abundantly and most compellingly evident in the fossil record: Fossils clearly indicate that organisms 500 million years ago were quite unlike organisms 100 million years ago which in turn were quite unlike organisms existing today. These changes in organisms are facts of evolution and taken together make evolution a fact.

       
---------------------------------
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed May 28 11:12:13 2008