Itıs both fact and theory depends on how you use the word (at the risk of
starting that whole discussion up again...)
Hereıs a well-known take on the subject:
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_fact-and-theory.html
I also found Allan Harveyıs definitions helpful:
http://members.aol.com/steamdoc/sci-nature/Chapter5.pdf
On 5/27/08 5:09 PM, "Hofmann, Jim" <jhofmann@exchange.fullerton.edu> wrote:
> There is quite a lot of literature on this topic. You can find some by
> scrolling down to section 6 on this website:
>
> http://nsmserver2.fullerton.edu/departments/chemistry/evolution_creation/web/
> <http://nsmserver2.fullerton.edu/departments/chemistry/evolution_creation/web/
> >
>
> Jim Hofmann
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf
> Of Dehler, Bernie
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 4:06 PM
> Cc: asa@calvin.edu
> Subject: [asa] Is evolution a fact?
>
> What do you all think? I keep hearing some say that "evolution is a
>
> fact." I don't think so. Evolution is a grand overarching theory to
>
> explain how everything complex came from something very simple. How can
>
> it be a fact when certain parts are unknown, such as "origin of life."
>
> Therefore, isn't it an obvious error to say that "evolution is a fact?"
>
> I think Dawkins calls it a fact, as well as an evolutionary Christian I
>
> heard the other day in a DVD.
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
>
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue May 27 20:44:11 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 27 2008 - 20:44:12 EDT