[asa] public response

Rich,
  It looks as if at least one person wants to continue an "open and honest debate." I think portions of Jeff's review would be quite relevant here.
  http://deltackett.com/

How can we convey the point that it is not that doubts about evolution, per se, are not acceptable but that it is the quality and method in which those doubts are brought forward. The scientific community would be extremely interested in any data that would alter our understanding in any way. But those skepticisms and questions must go through the same rigor of scientific review and methodology as anything else. And until they do, the doubts are just that, and not legitimate scientific results. Most of all, any attempt to insert such claims that bypasses the normal process is bound to gather pushback.

Randy

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon May 19 19:10:52 2008