On May 17, 2008, at 6:55 AM, David Heddle wrote:
> David,
>
> But why is it misplaced? YECs use Barr as a scholar who affirms
> their claim that the only reasonable interpretation of the writer of
> Genesis was yom = ordinary day. That supports YECism. The fact the
> he then uses that as part of an argument against inerrancy is
> unimportant. They can agree that from that point on, they diverge
> from Barr.
>
> To me it seems like a fair argument for YECs to make.
>
> David Heddle
It is unfair because it is special pleading. I am sure that YEC
accepts nothing else of Barr and his colleagues while it ignores a
wide swath of conservative linguistic scholarship. If Barr is
considered untrustworthy everywhere else why accept him here only
because it advances your point?
Rich Blinne
Member ASA
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat May 17 09:14:55 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 17 2008 - 09:14:55 EDT