RE: [asa] ID is not "scinece" because...

"Exploring Evolution" doesn't teach ID, as far as I remember- I have a
copy. As for "Pandas", I thought the Discovery Institute doesn't
recommend that as a textbook? Casey Luskin told me that (he's with the
Discovery Institute).

-----Original Message-----
From: David Opderbeck [mailto:dopderbeck@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:46 PM
To: Dehler, Bernie
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] ID is not "scinece" because...

Yes there is; it's called "Explore Evolution":
http://www.discovery.org/a/4096

Before that you of course had "Of Pandas and People."

Before anyone lambastes me, I'm just pointing out that there is a
textbook, not arguing for its merits (or demerits) or suggesting that
ID is "science," which I think is in any event a pointless discussion.

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Dehler, Bernie <bernie.dehler@intel.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> One piece of evidence that "ID is not science" is that there exists no
> textbook for it. The Discovery Institute could make a textbook if
they
> wanted- but they don't. And if they did, you know the attention and
> critique it would get-so this proves it is not ready as a science.
> Therefore- how could it be taught in schools, if there's no textbook
for it
> ???

-- 
David W. Opderbeck
Associate Professor of Law
Seton Hall University Law School
Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.