Guilty as charged. However, I have not read much from the four, but have encountered serious critiques that they do not represent the history of science accurately. The same holds for what scientists do qua scientists. I try not to legislate the activities of scientists, though I have to recognize that the Creator cannot be put in a test tube. Dave (ASA) a On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:29:34 -0700 Jim Armstrong <jarmstro@qwest.net> writes:Dave Siemens is one of those philosopher critters. JimA Ted Davis wrote:Gregory, I (for one) have a strong but limited interest in philosophy of science--strong, in that I have always liked reading some of theclearer andbetter philosophers of science, but limited, in that I rarely canjustifynot reading some other things in order to read more philosophy ofscience.I took a grad course in POS from a Lakatos student who also knewPopper, soI'm familiar with them. And everyone in my field knows Kuhn, whoseworksI've used in my own courses from time to time. Never read any Feyerabend--he (like Polanyi) was on the Index at my grad program,so tospeak, despite his obvious influence on Kuhn who was not similarlyignored.The ASA list rarely talks about any of those guys, but manyarticles in ourjournal (PSCF) do talk about them, sometimes even in aprofessionalphilosophical way. You might try browsing our web site for someexamples.You can search for key words in past issues. There are a few philosophers in the ASA, but (perhaps I'm failingto thinkof someone) I don't think there are on this list presently.Sometimespeople think of me as a philosopher, but that's a bad mistake. Ted To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 03 2008 - 15:58:16 EDT