The only review that I know of that meets all three criteria is the review by
Kenneth R. Miller in Nature (2007; 447: 1055-1056).
Behe has responded to Miller. You will need to assess whether Behe has addressed
Miller's main points.
Don
SteamDoc@aol.com wrote:
> Somebody at my church is going to present a 4-week class based on Behe's
> latest book (which I have not read). This person (retired public school science
> teacher) does not really have the background to judge the scientific
> arguments in the book, but then again neither do I.
>
> I wonder if anybody could recommend a critique (negative, positive, or
> mixed) of the book that would meet the following 3 criteria:
> 1) From a Christian perspective
> 2) From somebody with relevant scientific expertise
> 3) From somebody who is not a part of the ID movement
>
> Allan (ASA Member)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Allan H. Harvey, Boulder, Colorado | SteamDoc@aol.com
> "Any opinions expressed here are mine, and should not be
> attributed to my employer, my wife, or my cat"
>
>
>
> **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
> http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Jan 20 17:36:51 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 20 2008 - 17:36:51 EST