Re: [asa] A case of non-biological ID

Hi Rich,

Thanks for compiling such an interesting list. I have to admit that many of its features are new to me. But in posting this you appear to be missing my point concerning 666. This number is not simply _triangular_, but _uniquely triangular_; and it is _God-ordained_ because the very first verse of the Book of Revelation informs us so. I have detailed these truths in the page "An Obligation Declined", which I invite you to read. It may be found at www.whatabeginning.com/ObDec.htm

In the meantime, I await a clarification of your original statement, "Thus, Vernon's non-biological ID has the same weakness that biological ID has: an overly stretched inferred teleology when the evidence for it is extremely weak." Rich, it really is important that I fully understand the basis of what, on the face of it, appears to be a withering criticism. I'm sure you would not wish to deny me a considered response.

Thanks.

Vernon
www.otherbiblecode.com
www.whatabeginning.com
 

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jan 11 17:18:52 2008