George McCready Price was popular among conservative Prots in the 1920s,
whether or not they accepted his flood geology (most I think did not) and
his recent creation (nearly all did not). He had more than 2 dozen articles
in the Sunday School Times (a leading fundamentalist weekly) during the
1920s, and also a few in the staid Princeton Theological Review. Harry
Rimmer thought well of Price, and he was one of the (very few) "scientists"
(he wasn't a scientist, of course) that William Jennings Bryan hoped to have
as an expert witness at the Scopes trial (Price was in England and declined
the invitation). Mostly, as far as I can tell, the cons Prots liked his
aggressive anti-evolution stance. The rest, they could take it or leave it.
Mainly, leave it.
Ted
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Dec 17 16:55:28 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:55:28 EST