Re: [asa] Does the flagellum prove Genesis?

An interesting comment from Bernie.
Michael Denton has already broken away from the ID movement.
Dembski has stated that TE is no friend of ID (and that is part of the
reason that I am now strongly against ID). Of course TE is a friend of id.
I do not see Behe breaking away on his own accord, but being
increasingly confined in the corner in which he has painted himself.
Possibly the ID big tent may splinter because of internal stresses.
Don

Dehler, Bernie wrote:
> I have a feeling the ID movement is fracturing. I think it clearly
> started out as "anti-evolution," judged by reading Phillip Johnson's
> book. There is no conception of Theistic Evolution with them. I never
> heard it from them. They think evolution is atheistic and evil. They
> make the argument sound like it is "Creationism vs. Evolution."
> However, TE's are also creationists. I think there are recent ID
> changes because of Behe. I wonder if Behe will break-away, or ID will
> accept theistic evolution as a possibility. Behe confuses me...
> sometimes against evolution, sometimes looking like he is for it.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Dec 7 16:35:21 2007