Strike one, Pim.
If necessary, please re-read the OP and then actually address the question - no need to discuss intelligent design theories or divert, distract, wander away. The title of the thread makes the question rather obvious. If you won't or can't answer it or make a positive contribution to ASA's knowledge, then it appears Peter Loose's opinion of you is justified. Why not just share your perspective?
What, in your view, IS science, Pim?
PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com> wrote:
Simple; You show me what ID has contributed to science. Explain how ID can add to our knowledge. Explain what ID relevant predictions have been made. One does not have to define what science is to understand that ID is scientifically vacuous. But I am always open to others showing that ID does have a scientific relevance.
---------------------------------
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Sep 15 14:41:13 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 15 2007 - 14:41:13 EDT