Re: [asa] ICR's GENE project - ethics

Burgy -

The argument I tried to make was not based on the claim that ICR is
fraudulent - at least not directly. They invited (at least as I read what
you posted) the participation of "cousins." If that is correct, & if
"cousins" be used in a broad sense ("Anyone more collaterally related more
distantly than a brother or sister" in my old Webster's 2d) then members of
other species are our cousins.

Is this a stretch? Sure. Does that bother me? In view of the nature of
ICR, not much.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] ICR's GENE project - ethics

> I've thought a lot about this subject in the past couple of days.
>
> Some here seem to be arguing that, since ICR is a fraudulent
> organization, it would be perfectly ethical to mess with their research.
>
> At least that's the only argument I've seen. Is there another one?
>
> Is the argument strong enough? I do not believe that it is.
>
> Convince me.
>
> Burgy
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 29 14:06:43 2007