On 6/28/07, David Campbell <pleuronaia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If they accepted the sample and didn't notice
> anything unusual about it, or noticed but fudged the data or analysis,
> then I think one could honestly use such an approach to debunk their
> effort.
I can't help but to think that this would be quite an interesting way to
test ICR science. Someone ought to give it a go. Pretty amusing.
Also, doesn't ICR remember the scientific method? After reading their
article, I felt like reminding them that you generally make your conclusions
*after *you have looked at the data, not before. ICR is basically saying
"we're going to do the GENE project, and we're going to find out that
evolution is *wrong*!" Nice little inversion of the scientific method :-)
-David B.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 29 13:27:14 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 29 2007 - 13:27:15 EDT