Peter Irons response is particularly interesting
<quote> a more candid assessment of its impact (and the source of
this commentary's title) came from the Discovery Institute's own
president, Bruce Chapman: "Dover is a disaster in a sense, as a
public-relations matter. . . . It has given a rhetorical weapon to the
Darwinists to say a judge has settled this."</quote>
Sure, ID will 'survive Dover', no question about that, religious
ideology does not disappear overnight just because a judge has ruled
that it is not science.
It surely puts a damper on the 10 year plan of the DI, as the Wedge
seems to have faltered.
On 6/20/07, Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> For those who may be interested in the DI's views:
>
> Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover
> By: David K. DeWolf, John G. West, and Casey Luskin
>
> http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3877
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 22 13:29:36 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 13:29:36 EDT