RE: [asa] Re: "junk" DNA

If one invokes the notion of Deity, say, like in Christianity, then one must insist on introducing the notion of the Fall of Man. Therefore, there is no assurance that what we observe today is what was so before the Fall. Accordingly, how the Universe evolved in time becomes so much of pure history that the human mind cannot fathom what occurred with the puny tools of science.

Moorad

________________________________

From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sent: Thu 6/14/2007 4:17 PM
To: dopderbeck@gmail.com
Cc: pvm.pandas@gmail.com; asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Re: "junk" DNA

I think that there is a slip up here. What human designer is both omnipotent and omniscient? Why would a deity who knows exactly what a final creature should be like in order to function with maximum efficiency have to tinker with dozens of whalelike creatures on the way to a final design? Why would there be a process taking 2 or 3 billion years from a start for life, hundreds of millions for development from the so-called "explosion," evolutionary trees with more lopped off branches than ones continuing to the present? Occasionally a human being will put things together in a single insight, but normally we try one thing after another until we get something that functions somewhat as desired. I owned (bought new) one of the first cars that was designed to reduce pollution--more things hung on the engine to do one thing or another. Worst car I ever owned, though it looked great. The dealer even brought an engineer from Detroit to try to get adequate function, without success.!
  One of its most endearing traits was dying during a left turn. The designers finally rethought the entire concept and have engines that are functional, economical and "green."
 
The ID designer may be incompetent, though smarter than we. The process theology Mind may be restricted by its connection to matter of a sort. But the Creator of orthodox theology is not restricted in knowledge or action, and the lesser made-in-human-image super-beings are.
Dave
 
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:21:12 +0200 "David Opderbeck" <dopderbeck@gmail.com> writes:

        It's fair to say that IDist, unless they base their views on their God
        not being wasteful, have no way to predict the existence or absence of
        junk DNA.
         
        I've never understood why this is taken as a strong argument againts ID. "Wasteful," after all, is a value judgment. Assuming God is the "designer," who is to say that what God has done is "wasteful?" Wouldn't be more than just a bit arrogant for a human being living at one particular moment in history, with all the limitations on cognition and knowledge that implies, to presume that the processes that produce "junk" DNA are "wasteful?" Even the term "junk" is rather silly, IMHO, regardless of whether non-coding DNA has any present function, as it also is a value judgment.
         
        Moreover, if the ID advocate suggests that we "detect" God's design because of a sort of analogia entis -- by some analogy to human design -- it would not be surprising in the least that God's design would resemble a process that produces artefacts such as non-coding DNA. I was in the Louvre this weekend, looking at paintings that were designed by people. Underneath the layers of visible paint, there are pencil lines that once supplied the initial outline for the finished design. Those pencil lines no longer serve any function -- they are covered over by the paint and invisible to the naked eye. Does the presence of "junk" pencil markings suggest the painting was created randomly rather than by design? Was it "wasteful" of the painter to start with pencil rather than to immediately splash paint onto the canvas?
         
        In addition, a microscopic examination of the canvas would probably reveal other artifacts of the design process arising from the design media chosen by the designer, which no longer serve any purpose -- say, tiny bits of fiber from the paint brushes embedded in the layers of paint, or invisible threads of canvas fiber that have become dislodged into the paint. I would daresay that in no area of human design is there a design process that incorporates 100% of the design media into the final functionality. This isn't necessarily "wasteful" -- it simply reflects the constrains of the physical media with which designers must work.
         
        Finally, if "waste" is a problem for ID, it is just as much a problem for TE. In fact, many materialist atheists argue exactly that evolution necessarily elides any concept of the Christian God because of the problem of "waste." It is ultimately a theodicy problem. And I have to imagine hearing God's response to Job: "where were you when I laid the foundation of the world?"
         

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jun 14 16:47:19 2007