People, in this case Christians, may come to the conclusion that the
Flagellum is intelligently designed. However, this can be disproven as
it is based on our present level of ignorance. Does this mean that ID
has been disproven? Some may take this stance.
On 6/6/07, Dave Wallace <wdwllace@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> PvM wrote:
>
> > ID would be irrelevant if it were not for the fact that IDists are
> > still proposing ID as a serious scientific alternative, and combined
> > with ID's dangerous theology I believe it behooves us to expose it for
> > what it really is.
> >
>
> Please explain what you think is dangerous about theology associated
> with ID especially given that they (officially) try not to identify a
> designer and even say it could be an ET which of course just begs the
> question of where did the ET come from.
>
> Dave W
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jun 6 18:14:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 06 2007 - 18:14:29 EDT