RE: [asa] Re: The Eden in Israel Proposition - Reconciling the story of creation with science

Hi Bruce,

Don't wish to throw any kinks in your theory but there are some
considerations. The rivers of Eden are in Mesopotamia. Ezekiel was
among the captives in Babylon by the "river Chebar" (Ezek. 1:3; 3:15,
23), corresponding to nar Kabari meaning the "great canal," the largest
of three or four navigable canals that watered the fields of ancient
Nippur. The tree of life appears to correspond with the date palm, the
"sacred tree" depicted in numerous Sumerian cylinder seals - again
Mesopotamia, not Israel.

Dick Fischer

Dick Fischer, Genesis Proclaimed Association

Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History

 <http://www.genesisproclaimed.org> www.genesisproclaimed.org

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of Bruce Paul
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:09 PM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: [asa] Re: The Eden in Israel Proposition - Reconciling the
story of creation with science

I'm trying to find a few apologists / thinkers review a book I'm just
about to have published. I began a study of the Eden in Israel
proposition while investigating the work and purpose of the Holy Spirit.
Because "Living Water" is Scripture's principal metaphor for the Holy
Spirit, I was going through every verse in the Bible referring to water,
wells, rivers, and springs, and it soon became clear that the river in
Eden is a type of the Holy Spirit. An interesting principle of scripture
I've often meditated on is how God regularly visits certain places over
and over again, such as the temple residing on the very location where
Abraham took Isaac to be sacrificed. After working through my study, I
became convinced that the first river from Eden mentioned in Genesis 2,
was the same river mentioned in Ezekiel 47, and both of these were
for-runners of the River of Life found in Revelation 22.

I had come to believe these were all one in the same river because:

1. All three of these rivers appear during principal
transformational points of the earth throughout redemptive history.

* Eden's River at the beginning of creation(Gen 1-2).

* Ezekiel's river during the New Millennium (Eze 40-47)

* The River of Life when the New Jerusalem comes down from
heaven (Rev 21-22).

2. All three rivers were accompanied by a version of the Tree of Life

* Eden's River with the Tree of Life (Gen 2:9)

* Ezekiel's River has trees on either side of the river. The
Ezekiel 47 passage records that there will be all kinds of trees for
food, which ties Ezekiel's orchard together with Eden (Gen 2:9), but the
trees will bear fruit every month and the leaves are for healing, which
ties it together with the River of Life in (Rev 22:2).

* The River of Life has two Trees of Life on either side of the
river (Rev 22:2)

3. All three of these rivers have an incredibly vast distribution

* Eden's River turns into four other rivers that water the whole
surface of the earth (Gen 2:6).

* Ezekiel's river flows down to the dead sea, but Zechariah 14
suggests that it will also flow down to the Mediterranean Sea (Zec 14:8)

* The River of Life will go out to all the nations (Rev 22:2)

4. All three of these rivers have a remarkable source

* Eden's River flowed out of Eden (Gen 2:10).

* Ezekiel's river flows out of the altar outside the temple (Eze
47:1)

* The River of Life flows from God's thrown and from the Lamb
(Rev 22:1)

I realized there is a very logical conclusion in associating these three
rivers together! If Eden's river flows from the same point these other
two rivers come from, Eden had to have originally been in the region we
now know as Israel. My mind started to race as I began to appreciate the
principle implication of this hypothesis, that the very ground that saw
the first sin and failure would become the very ground of redemption and
restoration. Why else would Israel be the Promised Land if God didn't
have an extraordinary plan in mind for this territory, and under premise
of the Eden in Israel Proposition, He was winning humanity back on the
very ground that saw man's original fall from grace.

Invigorated by this glorious possibility, and equipped with a geology
background that enabled me to proficient review maps of the region, I
tried to understand how Eden's River could have acted as the source of
the four other great rivers mentioned in the Genesis 2 account. But once
the source of the first river was fixed, the pattern was obvious; all
four rivers in the Eden narrative are coincidental to the Great Rift
Fault. The Tigris and Euphrates flow directly out of the East Anatolian
Fault (which is actually an extension of the Great Rift Valley), the
Gihon (assuming that Josephus and the book of Jubilees are correct in
suggesting the Nile is the Gihon) and the Pishon (assuming that Farouk
El-Baz's Kuwait river in Arabia is the Pishon) also have headwaters that
are suspiciously coincidental to the Great Rift Valley.

Tying this together with Genesis 2:6, "But a mist used to rise from the
earth and water the whole surface of the ground," it seems apparent that
the water was flowing underground from the center of all these river
headwaters from an area we now know as Israel. I've recently discovered
that Dr A. Yahuda suggested the water from Eden flowed underground 70
years ago, but I believe I'm the first to put together this connection
with the Great Rift Valley.

Soteriology, Pneumatology, Eschatology, and even Hermeneutics all have
wide-ranging implications effected by this Eden in Israel proposition,
yet there's a theme that can be found weaving its narrative throughout
all these fields of endeavor, tying them all together and affecting the
very way we live - The message and mandate defining our inheritance
within the Kingdom of God. The Eden in Israel proposition doesn't
contradict conservative evangelical Christian doctrine. Yet, many of the
implications of this proposition are unconventional, and challenge many
traditional concepts in scripture. The mysteries uncovered by this
theory are, however, nothing less than astonishing, and provide a
remarkable framework for understanding the message of God's Kingdom and
His purposes with the land of Israel. I believe this work is only the
beginning; inspiring many other works to follow, resolving mysteries
that have confounded and separated the Church for thousands of years.

This book is an honest endeavor from a Christian geologist's perspective
to reconcile many issues of science and the history of religion,
together with a conservative evangelical perspective on the authority
and inspiration of the scriptures. If you or anyone in your group would
be interested in reviewing this 124 page book, let me know and I'll send
along a pdf copy.

Kindest Regards

Bruce Paul

bruce@faith-friends.com

  _____

Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48225/*http:/new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/f
eatures/mail/index.php> alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jun 6 14:38:04 2007