I know that he is pro-ID. But, when he talks in churches such as my
own he is more involved with promoting critical thinking and here not
limited to the origins debate.
On Apr 29, 2007, at 5:23 PM, David Opderbeck wrote:
> Rich, check out Groothuis' blog, the "Constructive Curmudgeon,' and
> I think you'll see I'm right. (http://
> theconstructivecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/ )
>
> On 4/29/07, Rich Blinne <rich.blinne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2007, at 2:07 PM, David Opderbeck wrote:
>
> >
> > Here is my take on that, which I admit isn't terribly thorough: The
> > "Biola School" -- typified by folks, like JP Moreland, Doug
> Groothius,
> > and Norm Geisler -- is fundamentally committed to (1) a
> > reliablist-foundationalist, common sense epistemology; (2)
> > propositional truth; and (3) a strong form of Biblical inerrancy
> > derived from (1) and (2).
> >
>
> I've heard Doug Groothuis several times and his "thing" is more the
> epistemology vs. the origins implication of the epistemology. What he
> really wants to see particularly in the church setting is better
> critical thinking skills. Just give him a 2x4 labeled the law of non-
> contradiction and he will readily whack anybody upside the head with
> it. While this epistemology is more often associated with ID I don't
> see this as necessarily so.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Apr 29 20:22:25 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 29 2007 - 20:22:25 EDT